Replace the lab · Keep the margin

  • $90–$120+typical variable savings per pair vs many outsourced lab invoices
  • 70–90% marginscommonly cited on cash-pair orthotics when you keep the lab margin
  • Same-daydevices in-clinic vs 2–4 week lab turnaround—when printer + staffing fit

Orthotics are not a cost center—they are a high-margin clinical service when you own design + production. Numbers vary by payer mix and shop cost—use our calculators to stress-test yours.

3D Printed Orthotics — Built on a Clinical Workflow

Design and manufacture custom orthotics through a connected digital process — from patient exam to finished device.

ArchSpline links scan data, clinical prescription, and orthotic design into a single workflow, enabling clinics to produce patient-specific devices without relying on external labs.

Orthotic design software lets clinics design and manufacture custom orthotics in-house using 3D printing—eliminating outsourced lab pairs for many pairs, cutting turnaround from weeks to same-day when capacity allows, and keeping margin that used to leave the practice.

3D Printing Is Only One Part of the Workflow

3D printing has made orthotic production faster and more accessible — but printing alone does not solve the core challenge.

The real difficulty is translating clinical findings into a correct, condition-specific orthotic design.

Without that step, digital manufacturing simply produces inconsistent or generic devices more quickly.

The value is not the printer. It is the system that drives what gets printed.

From Scan to Orthotic — A Connected Digital Workflow

1. Scan

Capture foot geometry using 3D scanners or mobile-based scanning tools.

2. Clinical Input

Document diagnosis, biomechanics, and prescription intent.

3. Design

Protocol-driven software generates a patient-specific orthotic design.

4. Manufacture

Export directly to 3D printing or other manufacturing workflows.

By connecting each step, clinics move from fragmented processes to a streamlined, repeatable system for orthotic production.

Why Clinics Are Moving to Digital Orthotic Production

Clinical Advantages

  • More consistent, condition-specific designs
  • Faster iteration and adjustment
  • Reduced variability between providers
  • Better integration with clinical workflows

Operational Advantages

  • Shorter turnaround times (days vs weeks)
  • Greater control over production and materials
  • Reduced reliance on external labs
  • Lower per-device production cost

Technology Enables — Workflow Delivers

3D printing enables faster production, but clinical workflow determines quality and consistency.

Learn how design impacts outcomes in our step-by-step orthotic design guide.

Workflow Economics Model (Editable)

Use your own pricing and volume assumptions. This model is directional and should include realistic labor, remakes, and fixed-cost allocation.

Modeled in-house cost per pair: $26.33
Monthly contribution (lab model): $8,700
Monthly contribution (in-house model): $11,210
Contribution difference: $2,510 / month

Adopt a Clinical-to-Manufacturing Orthotic Workflow

Build consistency first, then validate economics with your own patient mix and throughput.

What clinicians are saying

Feedback from podiatry and orthotic design specialists using ArchSpline in practice.

New version is amazing. You created a cool program for new feet morphology and individual insoles design! Amazing Bryan!

Sergey Aleks

Orthopedic doctor, Podiatrist, Orthotic Design Specialist